by mattsteg » Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:59 pm
At some point one starts to wonder if it's worth having these trails on the map at all. Trails are similarly way off in the areas I know best. One in particular starts and ends on a local (snowmobile) trail), but in the middle follows, alternately, several other trail segments (some that you could drive a car down, some that haven't been used in 20 or 30 years), plus goes through a lot of woods and swamps where there aren't any trails, as much as a mile or so away from the trail that I think it might be supposed to be following. It's almost like they knew certain bits of trails were there and guessed at how they were connected, getting it wrong. It's kinda baffling and makes it tough to develop any level of trust in whether most foot trails in delorme's map data exist and even remotely resemble their layout in topo. Is it useful to "know" that there might be a trail here (or somewhere within a mile+) that might follow the route shown?
I submitted a revision, including state GIS data with the trail that I think they want.
There might have been a trail through most of the route given 20-30 years ago, but parts of it I just don't even remember the remnants of a trail, and there certainly isn't one now.