WestportRiver wrote:I currently use XMAP 6 Pro and a PN-40 for forestry and natural resources assessment work, plus some freeware GIS that uses shapefiles (fGIS). I am considering upgrading to XMAP Editor or another program. I would like to hear from XMAP Editor users on how they have been satisfied with the product. Comments on any or all of the following would be helpful, or simply your take on pros and cons.
1. Does Editor work well with GIS layers downloaded from public GIS servers (e.g. countours, water bodies, wetlands, and other data commonly available on state GIS websites)?
2. Do you have any trouble interchanging data with users of ESRI products (import and export), and if so is this a major limitation?
3. I have found that XMAP Pro the maps can only be saved in low resolution (PDF or JPG). Does Editor have a higher resolution map save option for creating crisp, professional quality maps?
4. Are dates available for the donwloaded aerial imagery (they are not for TOPO USA and XMAP Pro)?
5. Can the database files associated with polygons be exported in a format that can be opended in Excel?
6. In general, for professional uses such as forestry or natural resources assessment of properties ranging from 50 acres to a few thoudsand acres, is this an acceptable alternative to ArcMap?
I'm not a professional user of XMap (meaning that I use it, but not in a professional manner) but I can give some insights that I've come across -
1. I believe it of course depends on what format you get the layer. However, once you get it into Xmap, Editor has a lot more functions for managing and displaying the data - like categorization and custom properties/fields that you can use functions in to set display and other text for layer items. These don't exist in Pro.
2. Can't comment, since I don't know anyone personally to trade with.

3. Not too sure what you're meaning here by 'saving'. If I import a GeoTiff that's high resolution (10cm, for example) the image stays at 10cm after import? Unless you're meaning printing of said maps?
4. No - this isn't an Xmap or client program limitation, it's on NetLink side. However, if I recall, the last official note by DeLorme stated that all Imagery of the US was dated 2009 or later.
5. Not sure about this one. It *obviously* can, if you know SQL and want to export the data that way. I'm assuming at the moment you're meaning through Xmap.

6. I don't see why not. My last heavy usage of Xmap was loading in the entire Wales area of OS OpenData in Shapefiles. At that amount of data, yes, it got slow. However, that was far, far larger than a couple thousand acres.

--Mike.